// archives


This tag is associated with 2 posts

friday five #14: podcast edition

With the newest episode of The More Trivial the Better out, featuring long stretches of silence from yours truly (please subscribe and review!), I thought it would be a good idea to devote this week’s Friday Five to my favourite podcasts.  I listen to podcasts a lot — when I run, when I’m pretending to work, and when I’m baking — so I’ve had on-and-off love affairs with a number of great podcasts.  Here are five consistently excellent ones.

  • Caustic Soda.  Based out of Vancouver, hosts Toren, Kevin, and Joe choose one horrible way to die every week and explain it, make fun of it, and discuss its representations in popular culture.  I think my favourite recent episode was the one on cults, and I admit to going in to full on nerd-rage on my run a few weeks ago when they failed to mention that D’Arcy McGee was a poet AND skipped Pierre Laporte altogether in the assassinations episode.  I like things that make me nerd rage.  Hopefully one day they will need an expert in Canadian Literature for some reason and will call me to be on the show.
  • The Film Vault.  Any aspirations to Movie Buff-ness I have are due to this podcast.  It’s a movie podcast, but instead of talking about new releases and upcoming industry news, Film Vault is a more thoughtful production, organizing the show thematically.  Each episode has hosts Bryan and Anderson listing their “top five” of something — for example, my recent favourite was Top Five Disturbing Documentaries.  The hosts have a good cop / bad cop thing going that works well, and the show is consistently funny and will definitely suggest movies you’ve never considered before.
  • Okay, this one is actually multiple podcasts, but I’m more than a little obsessed with the How Stuff Works podcasts, especially Stuff You Should Know, Stuff You Missed in History Class, Stuff Mom Never Told You, and Stuff to Blow Your Mind.  My husband describes these podcasts as someone reading you a Wikipedia page aloud, and that’s kind of true, but the hosts are all lovely and the material fascinating.  Most handily, though, you don’t have to download and subscribe to these podcasts — there’s a fantastic streaming app for iOS that works wonderfully well.  It’s the official app of me doing the dishes!
  • This Week with Larry Miller.  Do you love Larry Miller?  Okay, wait, before you answer that, go Google him.  I’ll wait here.  Okay, now, see, you love Larry Miller, right, now that your memory is jogged?  Character actor / comedian Larry Miller hosts this weekly podcast where, really, he just tells stories for half an hour.  Moments from his storied career as an actor, stories about his childhood, stories about his family — it doesn’t really matter, because he’s incredibly engaging and you’ll hang off every work.  I enjoy every episode.  It’s like carrying a funny old man around in your phone.  No, They Were Very Cold was a great episode.
  • White Coat, Black Art.  Okay, not really a podcast, but since I never catch the show when it broadcasts, it’s a podcast to me.  Host Dr. Brian Goldman discusses medicine in Canada — the triumphs and failures — from a doctor’s perspective.  He’s big on patient self-advocacy and demystifying medicine.  He’s also funny and thoughtful, and very good at making complex issues accessible.

the five stages of grading

Everyone is familiar with Elisabeth Kübler-Ross and her stage model of coping with grief popularly known as the five stages of grief. What you may not know is that Kübler-Ross actually developed her theory as a graduate student, basing her conception of the process of loss on the experiences one goes through over a grading weekend.

In coping with grading, it’s important for graduate students and young professors to know that they are not alone and that this process takes time.  Not everyone goes through every stage or processes the reality of grading in this order, but everyone experiences some version of at least two of these steps.

Denial.  At this stage, the instructor is unwilling to acknowledge the size of the task ahead of him or her. An instructor in denial may be heard to say things like, “It’s not really that many essays, when you think about it.” An instructor in denial will grossly overestimate his or her potential assignment-per-hour output. Denial at the syllabus-creation stage of course development can lead to tears. Denial can also manifest itself as avoidance, where grading is put aside in favour of vastly more important activities like cleaning the fridge, baking, working out, or writing elaborate blog posts about the stages of grading.

Anger.  Usually anger begins once the instructor starts grading.  The first few papers are likely to excite the grader, but as a steady stream of errors trickles in, the instructor may become disillusioned. Commonly heard at this stage: “But we covered this in class!  A lot!” “Wait, what does this even mean?” “Redundant!  This is redundant!” Instructors at this stage of the process are likely to have unnecessarily large reactions to relatively small frustrations; for example, in one case an instructor screamed into a pillow upon discovering that every student in the class was still using “they” as a singular pronoun.

Bargaining. This stage usually begins as an earnest attempt to buckle down and grade.  The instructor might say, “If I grade five papers, I can watch one episode of House,” or, “For every page I grade, I get to eat a piece of candy.”  This process starts well, but as the instructor progresses the amount of work required to achieve the reward generally becomes smaller and smaller, until the instructor is checking Facebook after every sentence he or she grades.

Depression. At some point in a marking weekend, the instructor will come to realize that in spite of his or her best intentions, the papers won’t be marked in time for the next class. For the idealistic young instructor, this is also usually the moment he or she realizes that the assignments themselves are not particularly strong.  These realizations can lead to feelings of failure, spiralling into reality TV watchathons or video game blitzes instead of grading.  Ultimately, though, recognizing one’s limitations is a healthy part of the process that leads directly to the final stage.

Acceptance/Resignation. At some point, the instructor comes to term with the reality that the papers must be graded. This reality is usually acknowledged the afternoon before the instructor wishes to return the papers, leading to an all-night grading blitz. At some point and by some miracle, however, it all gets done, and the instructor is primed and ready to start to the process over again when the next major assignment comes in.

This blog post brought to you from somewhere under a pile of essays.